Heteronormativity Kritik Essay

This chapter is about sex, but not the sex that people already have clarity about. Outer office as a human, policy-making domain is organized around sex, but a sex that is tacitly located, and rarely spoken, in official discourse. The poli tics of outer blank pose exploration, militarization and commercialisation as they are conceived of and practiced in the US, embody a banknote between public and private (and appropriate demeanours, meanings and identities therein) highly dependent upon heteronormative hierarchies of office and propriety. The central aim of this chapter is to show how US outer set discourse, an royal discourse of technological, military and commercial superiority, configutes and prescribes success and successful behaviour in the administration of outer space in in particular gendered forms. US space discourse is, I argue, predicated on a heteronormative discourse of oppression that reproduces the sanction of straight masculinity(ies), and which hiera rchically orders the construction of other (subordinate) gender identities.Reading the politics of outer space as heteronormative suggests that the discourses through which space exists consist of institutions, structures of understanding, pragmatical orientations and regulatory practices organized and exemptiond around heterosexuality. As a oddly dominant discursive arrangement of outer space politics, US space discourse (re)produces meaning through gendered assumptions of exploration, colonization, economic endeavour and military conquering that are deeply gendered whilst presented as universal and neutral.US space discourse, which dominates the modern-day global politics of outer space, is thus formed from and upon institutions, structures of understanding, and practical orientations that privilege and normalize heterosexualiry as universal. As such, the hegemonic discursive rationalizations of space exploration and conquest ,re)produce both heterosexuality as unmarked (that is, thoroughly normal ized) and the heterosexual imperatives that constitute suitable space-able people, practices and behaviours.As the introduction to this volume highlights, the exploration and function of outer space can thus far be held up as a mirror of, rather than a challenge to, existent, terrestrially-bound, policy-making patterns, behaviours and impulses. The new possibilities for human progress that the application and development of space technologies dares us to make are grounded only in the strategy obsessed (be it commercially, militarily or otherwise) realities of contemporary global politics.Outer space is a conceptual, policy-making and material space, a place for collisions and collusions (literally and metaphorically) between objects, ideas, identities and discourses. Outer space, like multinational relations, is a global space always socially and locally embedded. there is nothing out there about outer space. It exists because of us, not in spite of us, a nd it is this that means that it only makes sense in social terms, that is, in relation to our own constructions of identity and social location.In this chapter, outer space is the problematic to which I apply a gender analysis an field of view wherein past, current and future policy-making is embedded in relation to authorized performances of power and reconfigurations of identity that are always, and not incidentally, gendered. Effective and appropriate behaviour in the politics of ourer space is configured and prescribed in particularly gendered forms, with heteronormative gender regulations endowing outer spaces hierarchies of technologically superior, conquesting performance with theif routine power.It is through gender that US techno-strategic and astro-political discourse has been able to (re)produce outer space as a heterosexualized, masculinized realm. Heteronormativity K 1NC 2. The drive to colonize space precludes indulge identities and concretizes sexual difference. This reinforces heterosexism and turns women into commodities. Casper and Moore 95 (Monica J. , Ph. D in sociology from the University of California, San Francisco, feminist scholar and researcher on reproductive justice. Lisa Jean, Ph. D in sociology from the University