Writing tips and writing guidelines for students. Case study samples, admission essay examples, book reviews, paper writing tips, college essays, research proposal samples.
Saturday, March 9, 2019
An Indian’s View of Indian Affairs: A Speech by Chief Joseph
Sunju Han History 152 Document digest During the late nineteenth century, gentle umteen changes have occurred during the Industrial Revolution. The vivification conditions in America were deteriorating for everyone who wasnt in the upper social economic classes. galore(postnominal) complaints were arising from the masses. Of the population, two primary documents have been observed to express the point of views of token groups they represent. One of these documents was from Chief Joseph of the Nez Perce Indians, from the Indian point of view. The other document was from the Populists Party, by and expectant representing the farmers and running(a) classes of the 1890s.The time period of both documents roughly range from the 1870s by dint of the 1890s. Chief Josephs speech was called An Indians View of Indian Affairs. In his speech, he speaks from the Indians perspective of how they ar hard-boiled and handled. One of the many issues he commences up is about the word of his p eople. He felt that his people are treated like animals and outlaws, be shot down or driven from country to country. The freshs who have encroached on their cut down have driven off their cattle and horses. They overly steal from the Indians. For example, whites would brand the Indians young cattle so that they buttocks claim it as their own.Chief Joseph also felt the whites were causing bothers on habit in order to start a fight between the whites and Indians. He pleads his case by stating how the Indians didnt kill off the kickoff white tagtlers that were having disoblige surviving. Now they repay their thanks by causing trouble because they have the power to conquer the Indians. In the beginning, the Indians gave up some of their land foolishly believe they would be left alone but the to a greater extent they gave, the to a greater extent that was taken from them. He complains that his people arent getting treated like humans. Many whites saw them as savages that dont lie with any other way than violence.In his speech he is taking an stimulated approach in order to gain the sympathy of law enforcers, copulation or the President, or from the population. As Chief Joseph was stating how his people were treated, he also state a worldwide outline of the future he project for his people. The future he envisioned consisted mainly of equality. He dreams of his people existence treated like all the other men from the states. He pleads that e realbody follows the similar set of legislation in the land that they all share. He believes that anyone innate(p) of the earth was born a free man and should be addicted liberty.He wants his men to have an equal chance at life in popular. The simple liberties like freedom to travel, work, trade where ever they choose, choice of teacher, or even following the religion of their fore fathers. The radical liberties stated in the very foundation of our country are what Chief Joseph is advocating for his people. He states that they allow for follow whatever laws set before them if they can get a chance of being treated like a real man in this country. Joseph did indeed believe that Native Americans and whites could coexist in the joined States.When the first white settlers appeared, he believed that they would all have the aforesaid(prenominal) set of morals and values. This was the basis of his belief in the coexistence of Indians and whites. His speech also depicts the very possibility of coexistence in exchange for equality. He believes that the Indians would have no problem or reason to cause conflict or trouble if these basic requests were met. He also believes that any man born in the same earth are all granted equal proficients from the moment they were born. He states that he is simply reclaiming those rights in order to help better the living conditions his people are living in.He also believes that much of the bloodshed and war can be avoided if each party can be more honest w ith each other and compromise. The Populists were the first political insurgency, meaning that they were the first to radically go against the ideas of our lands political policies. They were the first political party that appealed to the farmers and the producing class, which included the industrial workers to the miners. They were the first party to bring up any political platform on issues that were for the general operative class. Many of the other political parties would try to cover up the many problems present in our economy.They were the radicals that went against all the other political platforms, bring up issues that the big companies and industries try to overlook or cover up. The Populists believed that he nation found itself on the brink of moral, political, and material transgress. During those times rot, bribery, and dictatorship was rampant everywhere around the whole world, not just the joined States. The newspapers were bribed to be silenced, the public opinio n didnt matter anymore, and there was corruption in the ballot boxes. The laborers were denied the freedom to form unions anymore. The currency flow was curb by the mega-millionaires.There was no way of controlling the huge businesses to better the lives of the working class. These were some of the main issues that caused the Populists to believe that we were on the brink of moral, political, and material ruin. The two proposals put forth by the Populist Party that were large were the right to form labor unions and the ownership of all transportation to the government. The right to form labor unions would become a sort of balancing figure out for the big companies. It would restrain the rampant companies from making their workers suffer from unfair and unfair working conditions.It would also provide a system of control that the large industries didnt have before. The ownership of the railroads, telegraph, telephone, and post- office systems would create a cosmopolitan fairness for the masses. Since it is a crucial public necessity, a monopoly on any of these items could impact the whole country greatly. The government ownership of these systems would be for the general welfare of the people and create fees that can be affordable to the general masses and population throughout the United States. These are some of the issues and solutions stated in both Chief Josephs speech and the Populist platform.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment