Nature vs. Nurture in Oliver Twist Essay

Out of all in all the questions that any(prenominal)one whitethorn have for the novel, Oliver Twist, one of the to a greater extent common questions that can occur is What determines a persons personality, decisions, actions, etc. Is spirit to blame? Or is it treasures fault? Seeing as though Oliver was orphaned at birth and never had a real m new(prenominal) or siblings to look up to, this essay testament focus on the grow role of the question. Nurture, by definition, is the value of experiences, cultural influences, and versed actions/reactions in a growing matters life. Nature is defined as the qualities with which people are born (including hereditary make-up, stable personality traits, animals instincts, etc.) Oliver had many deplorable influences to decide that it may have been personality that had change him the approximately in this situation. In all cases, the reputation vs. nurture ponder is one and the same.Caring for a nestling most assiduously is very im portant, harmonize to the definition of nurture, and within the story of Oliver Twist, the chela never seemed to receive proper nurturing from any of the parochial people or thieves that he had accompanied. fiend writes the character of Oliver in a way that seems to cement his stance in personalitys court that Oliver appears to be an innately skilful person. His experiences in the workhouse, the revilement he has to endure from Mr. Bumble and other characters, and his exposure to a life of iniquity does not make Oliver turn from unspoiled to bad. However, to assume that the Tempter supports the idea that notwithstanding nurture is responsible for(p) for determining a persons personality would be incorrect. In fact, other characters within the novel, drift that they are products of their environments.This means that characters such as Nancy, the Artful Dodger, and others have been molded by their experiences, which weakly supports nurtures post of the take. From a scient ific point of view, most psychologists agree that neither nature nor nurture can be held completely responsible for the shaping of a persons personality. When faced with the nature vs. nurture make do in real situations, it is typically simulated that personality can be attributed partially to nature and partly to nurture. At commencement ceremony glance many of Dickenss characters appear to favor either nature or nurture, but further probe shows that each character embodies traits that can be attributed to both.In Oliver Twist, Dickens draws the attention to numerous issues. For example, on that point is a very clear theme of disapproval of the 1834 Poor honor Amendment Act (and its accompanying effects) throughout because novel. And while most of the other issues that Dickens includes in his writing are societal, he does bring up an interesting deal that has psychological roots. Although Oliver is surrounded by appalling situations, Dickens still had a trace of hope unde rscoring it all. At points, there were questions if that was because the ref knew what would happen in the end. But Dickens intended Oliver Twist to be fair humorous.For example, by illustrating the dichotomy of the wealthy, fat parish leaders feasting while orphaned workhouse children hunger on gruel. In conclusion, both sides to the debate of whether or not Oliver was most affected by nature or nurture remains to the opinion of the reader. Of course there may be certain mickle as to which side the reader may favor and Dickens had probably pursued that route, intending for the reader to decide Olivers fate. The nature vs. nurture argument pertains to anyone who wishes for a good debate in their reading selections of Charles Dickens.