Realistic Theory Education

Running head : Realistic Theory of EducationA Realist Theory of EducationMACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert abuse of Author (s ) here]MACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Institution information here] A Realist Theory of EducationThe ago philosopher Aristotle once said that all men by constitution desire to know ADDIN EN .CITE Aristotle1924886AristotleW . D RossW . D RossMetaphys ics1070 pages121924OxfordOxford University Press75 (Aristotle , 1924 . In a adept , this desire to know is constituent(prenominal) of what it fashion to be a forgiving being . Two hearty misgivings purloin first off , Does it division to know and second , why does it social occasion to know The answer to the first foreland is a matter of distrust . It is simply a matter of super irate sense , so to speak . The answer to the second question however , is not merely a matter of comprehension . It requires critical thinking . It matters to us that we know because knowing has a practical or a pragmatic valueIt is with this sentiment that primaeval may have a fuller understanding of the nubble of kind beings acquisition of familiarity . That to seek knowledge is constitutive of what it inwardness to be a human being and that knowledge has a practical or pragmatic value explains why there is a felt need to develop theories of command . This had been the principal(prenominal) labour of Philosophy of Education . This has a two-fold task first , it seeks to explicate a realist theory of education along with it philosophic motivations and underpinnings , and second , how a realist theory of education may appropriately address significant issues in a well-favored and classless political settingAn initial disambiguation of the term realism is required . In philosophy , realism is a meta bodily schooldays of thought . Meaning to say it is concerned with fundame! ntal ontology . Its perfume image then is the very notion of reality itself . naive realism is the apparent horizon that reality and the objects within it such as trees and stones , etc . exists and that their founding has an independence from a mind that perceives them .

Reality exists independently of human representation , so to speak . legerdemain Searle in his retain The Construction of Social Reality distinguishes between physical and neighborly facts . As Searle contends , the ontology of physical facts is different from the ontology of social facts ADDIN EN .CITE Searle1997666John R SearleThe Constru ction Of Social Reality256 pages1997Free Press94Engli sh (Searle , 1997 . He offers a useful characterization of realism when he writes : Reality exists independently of human representations . This view , called realism . is that though we have mental and lingual representations of the innovation in the form of beliefs , experiences , statements , and theories there is a macrocosm come to the fore there that is representations ADDIN EN .CITE SearleJohn R . SearleRationality and world : What Is at stake ?DaedalusDaedalus3 (Searle , 1993 ,. 60 . Furthermore , as John Dolhenty contends : Knowledge is the baring of Reality . It is not a worldly concern of our mind . The stripping of Reality is initially made by our external sense organs and then more abruptly by our agreement ADDIN EN .CITE Dolhenty5543John DolhentyA BRIEF ON THE perpetual PHILOSOPHYAugust...If you want to pound a full essay, order it on our website: Orde rCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a fu! ll essay, visit our page: write my paper