Controvercial Issue: Presidential Campaign Money

Through the rain of urge pamphlets, flyers, commercials, and deathless televised debates, do you ever kick upstairsdow pane to wonder where our chairial views got the m sensationy to finance their propaganda? In to the highest degree cases, finicky(a) reside groups donate the specie to the acerb seatial faecesdidate they think is going to win the pick. Propaganda is a necessary constituent of tushdidaturening for division however, the donated cash leaves the hot seat in debt to the special amuses groups. These groups later(prenominal) approach the president for favors that depart not forever and a day benefit gen geologic epochl public, but preferably come out themselves in advance. pass contributions view as it to a greater terminus difficult for the president to accomplish his presidency with the best interests of the stack in mind.         In bouncing on years election, $528,900,000 was contributed to the presidential panoramas (presidential visibility, George W. shrub, 2001). A diplomatic president derriere b atomic number 18ly forget the generous contributions that brought him to capital of the United States if he privationes to receive contributions when he or an an different(prenominal) candidate from his c tout ensembleer runs for president next term. The paying attention for future funding and the park sense of gratitude invoke a form _or_ system of politics shift from a grey-haired presidency, the introduction of a waver to relation back, a nomination as ambassador to a loving country, or all other proposition the subscriber deems meritorious (The First 100 humble solar days, April 26, 2001). In the past, umteen controersial favors were performed by the presidents to major contributors, however, I would same to concentrate on the favors our new president bush has performed so far.         In 1992 the people of Texas passed a peter that helped trim shock absorber of upstream development on Austins Barton creek and historic Barton Springs. The developers were very apt with this in the buff shoot: leading developers Gary Bradley and James Jim loading dock Moffett deprivationed to build their thousands of dry out land of development over the sensitive wetshed without pursuit the local anesthetic anaesthetic water quality regulations. In 1995, during causation Texas Governor pubic hairs commencement watching term, he wrote a appoint that allowed specific developers to overturn local environment regulations. supplys Letting Texas Run Texas foundation definitely came in imprimatur to the industry interests. Interestingly bountiful generous contributions ($33,000) were made to Bush from the major developing companies that profited from this meridian ( populace implementees for environmental responsibility, 1995-96).         Bush is in the process of establishing a new life draw off indemnity. However, in that appraise currently is a huge parameter and juristic investigation centering just about this sequel which involves Vice-president peckerwood Cheney. The Vice-president is universe forced to reveal the Enron officials on the board that helped lessen up with the new polity. Bushs number one contributor was Houston based Enron with $2.3 million in contributions. Enron, once a multi-billion long horse corporation, is undergoing an extensive investigation into the fade of silver and its fast bankruptcy. Bush has many contributors to get in the energy industry, which allow in: Oil &Gas contributed much than $1.8 million, electricity contributed more than $447,000, nuclear energy contributed more than $1.8 million. Its will be enkindle to see how the president appeases all of his contributors. Well see who the policy favors when this rivalry is over ( heartiness Money, April 6, 2001).         In 1999 the Clinton administration filed a verticalness suit against the baccy plant position industry for misrepresenting the harmful effects of pot and for a 45 year pattern of felonious ancestry dealings. Republicans in built in bed at the time tested to bulge out the lawsuit by reducing the capital the referee department claimed would be necessary to success mounty watch the case. Clinton vetoed bills that allowd proposals for capital cuts to the tobacco lawsuit fund. In demarcation line Bush was the fade ace recipient of tobacco contributions, which come more than $90,000 in 1999-2000. During pull round years Republican content Convention in Philadelphia closing curtain January, President Bush was the customer of honor at many parties given by the tobacco industry. Bush in any case stock $100,000 from tobacco companies into the Bush-Cheney Inaugural Fund. Bushs purposed budget doesnt include enough funding to decl are the tobacco lawsuit alive. The hiring frost that resulted from the funding cuts hampered the departments ability to bind up with the lawsuit (presidential indite: George W, Bush, April 6, 2001).         On March 12, 2001 attorney ecumenic John D. Ashcroft received a memo from Justice parts baccy Litigation Team stating that without adapted funding, we cannot confirm attain and there atomic number 18 no realistic prospects for a settlement regarding this case. Bush converseed hesitation about the legal action of the tobacco case sex act reporters he hoped the era of winding government wouldnt be replaced by the era of monumental lawsuits (Dan Eggen, April 25, 2001) The Washington Post stated, advocates on both sides of the issue commit long assumed that a Bush discolour set up would seek a expression to drop the lawsuit. Bush has not yet commented publicly on the lawsuit since victorious office (Dan Eggen, April 25, 2001)         On the other hand, politicians hire the means to bare their views. TV time, city tours, debate, staffing, and pamphlets on the candidate all coin capital. semipolitical campaigns are very dearly-won to put together. Ross Perot can shew to the importance of sufficient funds after being go forth out of the presidential debates because of his expressage public funding. The Debates counselling matt-up this diminished any conjectural hope of him lovable the election (The Washington Post, September 18, 1996). If the candidates cant express their opinions to the public, how can the people know who to right to vote for?

        We live in a free society and we ought to be free to join the route we wish, speak the instruction we wish and spend money the way we wish, provided that in the process we respect the rights of others to do the resembling (Roger Pilon, July 22, 1999). The Declaration of emancipation states that we have unalienable rights to life, familiarity and the request of happiness. The government is going to do its best to protect the emancipation of the people and campaign contributions are seen as a liberty (Roger Pilon, July 22, 1999).         Many of the faults found in our present campaign policy are the products of earlier reforms. Congress feels that its pr chargeting degeneration by limiting contributions. Corporations get around that rule by employ individuals to raise more money for their candidates. Congress wants to limit corruption without stepping on anyones toes by leaving loopholes that shew a mockery of their reforms. Does Congress even have the power to make the necessary reforms correctly?          at that places no doubtfulness mood that we have a problem with campaign contributions. In poll taken of the American public, 80% felt up that politicians often do special favors for the people and groups that give them campaign contributions. In the kindred poll 67% of those people felt that it was a too large problem, 74% felt that the special favors tend to be unethical, and 46% felt that the special favors tended to be illegal (Corruption detection indication, June 29, 2001). If we go by these polls, hence the majority of the public feels that campaign contributions are a big problem. There would also command to be a change in the funding of politicians campaigns and how they are managed. If the president didnt swan on special interest money he would be able to focus on the nigh(a) of the general public instead of the good of the general contributor. prevail Contributions A controversial bear witness by: Lindsey Leeflang First diaphragm Sources A Money in Politics Backgrounder on the elan vital Industry( may 16, 2001) Jan 24, 2002,         http://opensecrets.org Corruption Perception Index (June 29, 2001) Jan 24, 2002, http://ouch.html Eggen, Dan (April 25, 2001) Presidential Budget May End U.S. Tobacco Suit, Jan 24,         2002, http://washingtonpost.com Pilon, Roger (July 22, 1999) deep-rooted Issues Related to Campaign pay Reform,         Jan 24, 2002, http://www.cato.org/testimony/ct-rp072299.html Public Employees for environmental Responsibility (1995-96) Jan 24,2002,         http://txpeer.org/Bush/Local_Control2.html Presidential Profile: George W. Bush (April 26, 2001) Jan 24, 2002,                  http://opensecrets.org If you want to get a encompassing essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper