Question 9.
I will answer this question first by in short explaining the DNS structure and the commit way in which it is being regulated. I will thus outline the defects of the current system and then analyse some of the propositions that have been put forward in academic circles.
A public hold is simply an alphabetic imitation of an IP address, which consists of a series of numbers. A cosmos name is more memorable then an IP address and so is a more expedient means of allocating web pages. At present control over the creation and allocation of celestial sphere name calling is in the hands of a private non-profit US organisation; the International skunk for Assigned Names and Numbers (hereinafter ICANN). ICANN has control over top-level domain (TLDs) such as .gov, .edu etc and this controls spans throughout the globe because ICANN also exerts its ascertain over ccTLDs (country code top level domains). National entities such as the Hong Kong Domain Name Registration Company exceptional and Nominet in the UK have responsibility for the registration and assignment of the .hk and .uk domain names respectively. However, these entities are not autonomous, instead each of these bodies regulates their domain names according to the contractual stipulations dictated by ICANN.
The primer why ICANN has such immense control over the meshing is simply because the US controls the A root server as well 8/12 of the secondary root servers. As Hagen aptly puts it, such control forms the basis for a US claim tantamount to ownership of the entire domain space. However, at present a consensus is growing to have the powers of control amused away from ICANN to a more international body. For example the European Commission fears that the current US Green paper proposals could hike consolidate permanent US jurisdiction over...
If you want to rag a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment