An issue that is of both national and international concern is the skillful of homosexuals to marry. The issue of gay marriage is a highly moot and important issue in the 2004 Presidential Election. atomic number 53 could hark a host of spiritual rationalitys why gay marriages should be banned, but none would take in any relevancy beca physical exercise the genius establishes a separation of state and church. Therefore, any religious reason to ban gay marriages would not be a sensible reason to take such an action. Conversely, gay marriage should be declared legal for a variety of reasons. The most taken for granted(predicate) of them all is that to take away homosexuals right to marry would be depriving them of their polite rights. Thus, an amendment to the Constitution to ban gay marriage or to allow certain states to ban gay marriage would finally prove to be unconstitutional.
        There are those that say homosexuals should not be able to marry but should be allowed to have civil unions. This idea has prompted some states to enact civil unions as a substitute for gay marriages. However, civil unions do not offer the same benefits as marriage does such as heath care benefits. In addition, only allowing homosexuals to have civil unions are reducing them to second-class citizens. I find this to depict several parallels with how African-Americans and women were treated as second-class citizens by not sharing the same facilities or having the right to vote. One of them universe that homosexuals have no other choice but engrave into the undoubtedly inferior civil unions just as African-Americans had to use inferior schools, restrooms, and had limited opportunities. I do not fulfill how we can allow virtually the same basic injustices to prolong into the new millennium. This issue is important to me because as an American...
--
References
-->This is a healthful written, passionate essay. Although it does not provide many facts, it clearly represents the authors opinoins and feelings.
One thing to consider is the idea that a host of religious arguments could be made in opposition to gay marriages. immortalise that religion tends to be interpretive, meaning that some people impart see it one way while others see it another. For instance, on that point are many gay Christians who do not think that the bible condemns them for their sexual identity. Nonetheless, you are absolutely correct in your assertion that religion has no place in the governmental discussion regarding marital rights for gays and lesbians.
Very nice article.
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment