Capital punishment

A good argument paper supporting capital penalization same

Let us suppose that killing as a hold of punishment is a moral and universally accepted practice. Would it whence be unimpeachable to issue this irreparable sanction to a select few while allowing others, equally accountable, to avoid it? It is acceptable to our criminal justice system for it seems to be beat direct procedure. Many embrace the expiry penalization based on the eye for an eye concept. There is certainly some merit to this argument and it seems preferably fair and logical. Unfortunately our use of the death penalty is neither fair nor logical. Our criminal justice systems lip service to the age-old concept is an contemptuous disguise for such an obscurity of fairness and logic. The death penalty is frivolous and discriminatory in its procedure because of the unreasonable prices we have a bun in the oven to execute certain groups at more than higher pass judgment than others.

We pay different prices for using a death penalty. Sadly, at once more than ever, the dollar seems to be the endlessly interchangeable standard of value. We strive to make specie, save money and when we spend money we do so with a valued return in mind. Accordingly, a popular argument con exds that we spend too much money incarcerating prisoners for behavior.



We probably do but the price chamfer on issuing a death sentence accord to a Florida study is $3.1 million compared to $1 million for a life sentence; a 3100% difference (Walker 1994, 108). Imagine your death being valued at $3.1 million - how flattering. Based on these figures, the difference in the price of an execution and the price of life behind bars is enough to feed 7,200 starving children for ten years.

The price of an execution is amazing. Naturally, for such a price, we...

If you want to maintain a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper