Pop Art And Popular Culture

Andy Warhol s genus Dracula PaintingUnderstanding the artwork of Andy Warhol is something akin to figuring break a Zen riddle . That is , and people leave look for something whimsical when each they need to do is understand the simplicity of what they argon viewing . Andy Warhol s concept of pop art involved fetching the very common images in innovateing them in such a way that the commonality was elevated . But rout out you rattling elevate something that is common ? Apparently so Warhol did this quite efficaciously in his earlier works . as yet , in posterior years , Warhol s work started to look a little weary . Perhaps the novelty of pop art was wearing clear up and Warhol s creativity had stretched thin . There were , however , some elicit pieces of art produced by Warhol in the last decade of his action . This return to inspired creativity is patent in 1981 s motion-picture show DRACULA , one of his most underrated worksWhat was the inspiration for the DRACULA flick ? Was it Bram Stoker s novel ? Was it the classic Bela Lougosi interpretation ? Was it the popular trick PASSION OF DRACULA that proved very successful at the time To a degree , they may take for all had their influences in prompting Warhol to use Dracula as field of honor matter . But , do not let be fooled : Warhol was probably very influenced by a film he produced entitled BLOOD FOR DRACULABLOOD FOR DRACULA was an odd dark , sad satire that saw the aging Count travel to the Catholic country of Italy to find virgin blood Unless he can find such a victim , he will (finally ) die of old age . Of course , his search for a virgin proves fruitless and his days are numbered . While the self-evident satire of morality is evident , not so evident is the notion that Dracula represents the old world of the aristocracy . Dracula remains the last of the aristocrats having seen the world he previously knew dis show uping to the expansion of Marxism .

It is this same subtle theme that is also present in the DRACULA painting and that is what makes it so strikingWith fangs bared , mantlepiece cowl turned upwards , and look wide feed it would seem that this is a terrorisation picture of Dracula . Upon final stage examination , it really isn t . Yes , in a previous multiplication the image of Dracula recreated by Warhol would be considered terrifying . However , by 1981 , said to image really is - for lack of a better word - corny Economic woes , foreign insurance strife , and social upheaval had driven horror movies to work much violent and more graphic . The classic monsters plainly became a casualty of the era . They were no longer frightening . And , as the painting infers , Dracula knows this . If you look closely into the eyes of Dracula (in the painting ) you will notice decidedly out of place emotionsThe eyes simply do not appear menacing or frightening . Actually , they appear more confused than anything else . They are wide open and glassey and seemingly have a dual expression of shock...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper