(student s name (teacher (subject (dateDoes Nozick`s Discussion of the Experience Machine in effect Undermine HedonismUtilitarianism claims that the morally right act or policy is that which produces the greatest happiness for the members of society (Kymlicka , 10 , or , as has traditionally been defined , the greatest happiness for the greatest do of people (Daniel , n .p . Not counting the merits and demerits of utilitarianism as a political morality may sustain , the verge well beingness or utility or greatest happiness have received enough attention such that utilitarians have sided with the antithetic perspectives on what the term means . One of the most everyday answers is that utility could be equated to sport As such , the term greatest happiness becomes interchangeable with greatest pleasure The utilitarians who retrieve this way are those who are called Welfare Hedonists (Kymlicka , 13 . They depend to have sprang directly from Jeremy Bentham who spoke of a summum bonum (maximum happiness , of pleasure and irritation as the two sovereign masters whose biddings the benignant being could not resist : Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters , aggravator and pleasure . It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do , as well as what we shall do (Bentham in Pojman , 143 . With pleasure (coupled with pain being the ultimate principle , Bentham s version of hedonism makes a refreshing sensation as the one good as the end-in-itself (Kymlicka , 13 , the one thing that has intrinsic value . This sense of ultimacy of pleasure is well expressed in Bentham s famous name : pushpin is as good as poesy (Bentham in Kymlicka , 13 ) if pushpin could very well produce the pleasures that poetry is able to give . But then , as allow Kymlicka pointed out , what about people who are disturbed by reading poetry but continuously does so ? The marginal hedonistic answer would be , such persons enjoy being disturbed they are masochists to a certain extent (Kymlicka , 13 .
As such , a hedonistic utilitarian s bear upon ought to be the maximization of pleasure of the greatest number and the declination of pain as much as possible . It could clearly be determined that the basic assumption of Welfare Hedonists would be that sensible pleasure , i .e , pleasure that could be go through , is supreme . This supremacy applies to the moral evaluation of both soulfulness acts and to state policiesRobert Nozick is one of those who undermine hedonistic utilitarianism In his tidings , Anarchy , State , and Utopia , Nozick discussed a suasion experiment aimed at undermining the very foundations of hedonism . In this , the question whether Nozick truly undermined the foundations of hedonism shall be investigated . This shall conclude that in fact Robert Nozick s experience machine does undermine the important assumption of hedonists . This shall be done by first discussing Robert Nozick s thought experiment on the experience machine then after on discussing how the experiment successfully undermined hedonismI . Robert Nozick s Experience MachineRobert Nozick , in his control , Anarchy , State , and Utopia , came up with a thought...If you want to purpose a full essay, order it on our website:
Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment